Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 05:50

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What is one thing which you cannot stop however hard you try?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Science news this week: 'Dragon Man's' identity and the universe's 'missing matter' - Live Science
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
This overlooked cause of PTSD is only going to get worse - vox.com
Just in the last 5 years:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Donkey ‘Drops Off’ Baby with Human Mom After Apparently Needing a Break - PetHelpful
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What are your thoughts on RM's new album "Right Place, Wrong Person"?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
If you could instantly cancel one social norm, what would it be?
What’s next?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Scientists Create Living Building Material That Stores Carbon Like a Tree - Indian Defence Review